PFAS Water Contamination

The Environmental Litigation Group (ELG) currently represents hundreds of public entities and individuals whose water supplies are contaminated with chemicals known as per-and polyfluoroalkyl substances, or PFAS. This is a family of chemicals used to create nonstick, stain resistant, and waterproof products as well as industrial products including certain fire-fighting foams. Several companies made PFAS-containing products despite knowing that toxic PFAS compounds would be released into the environment when used by customers as instructed and intended.

“PFAS” refers to a class of thousands of man-made chemical compounds known as per-and polyfluoroalkyl substances. The most notorious of these are perfluorooctanoic acid (PFOA) and perfluorooctane sulfonic acid (PFOS), two chemicals used to create many nonstick, stain resistant, and waterproof products. These are also the chemicals used in the manufacturing of aqueous film-forming foam, or AFFF, a fire-fighting agent used to fight fires in many locations world-wide, including military bases, airports, petroleum refineries, industrial facilities, fire departments, and fire training centers.

Because of environmental and human health concerns, manufacturers ceased production of PFOS in 2002; manufacturers likewise agreed to reduce production of PFOA beginning in 2006 although they used component chemicals that they knew would break down into PFOA.

Once released into the environment through dispersal or improper disposal of a product, PFAS persist in the environment. These compounds are water-soluble and do not readily adsorb into sediments or soil; they tend to stay in the water column. Because these chemicals resist breaking down, scientists have found them globally — in water, soil, and air as well as in human food supplies, breast milk, umbilical cord blood, and human blood serum. These chemicals are often referred to as “forever chemicals” because of their persistence in the environment. Both PFOA and PFOS are known animal carcinogens and are likely human carcinogens. Given their potential health risks, the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) asked the manufacturers to reduce their use of these chemicals.

In 2024, EPA established legally enforceable levels, called Maximum Contaminant Levels (MCLs), for four PFAS in drinking water: PFOA, PFOS, PFHxS, PFNA, and HFPO-DA.  In addition, EPA as contaminants with individual MCLs, and PFAS mixtures containing at least two or more of PFHxS, PFNA, HFPO-DA, and PFBS using a Hazard Index MCL to account for the combined and co-occurring levels of these PFAS in drinking water. EPA also finalized health-based, non-enforceable Maximum Contaminant Level Goals (MCLGs) for these PFAS. Those levels are shown below:

The rule requires public water systems to start testing for these compounds and will require them to implement treatment solutions if drinking water levels exceed these MCLs.

EPA is also making unprecedented funding available to help ensure that all people have clean and safe water. In addition to the final rule, EPA announced $1 billion in newly available through the Bipartisan Infrastructure Law to help states and territories implement PFAS testing and treatment at public water systems and to help owners of private wells address PFAS contamination.

AFFF manufacturers had the technology to produce AFFF with safer chemicals from as early as the 1960s. However, these manufacturers knowingly chose to make and sell AFFF with PFOA and PFOS. Cities, towns, and neighborhoods surrounding locations where AFFF was dispersed into the environment have reported contaminated groundwater and soil in their communities. Airports, fire-training facilities, and nearby properties may also be contaminated. Chemical manufacturers can be held liable for their negligence. Litigation against these companies has resulted in the recovery of billions of dollars, much of which has been applied toward the cost of cleanup efforts.

ELG currently represents public entities (including States) who are seeking damages for PFAS contamination to public water systems, airports, fire-training facilities, and other sites. In addition, ELG represents individual owners of private wells and other contaminated properties.

Dupont Settlement

Scott Summy, Shareholder of the Environmental Litigation Group, gives an overview of the $1.185 billion settlement Baron & Budd reached with Dupont for its contamination of public water systems with PFAS. Speaking to officials of the public water systems represented in the case, Scott provides history of the case, how payments will be used to meet the needs of public water systems, the various funds available based on need, how compensation will be calculated for public water systems, and more.

3M Settlement

Scott Summy, Shareholder of the Environmental Litigation Group, provides an overview of the historic $12.5 billion settlement Baron & Budd reached with 3M Company for its role in contaminating public water systems with PFAS. In the webinar, Scott shares the history of the case, how payments will be used to meet the needs of public water systems, how compensation will be calculated for public water systems, and more.

Tyco Fire Products Settlement

Tyco Fire Products has agreed to pay $750 million to resolve PFAS-related drinking water contamination claims in the nationwide Aqueous Film-Forming Foam (AFFF) Products Liability Litigation (MDL 2873). The settlement will provide funds to public water systems in the U.S. that tested and found PFAS in a water source (i.e., a groundwater well or a surface water intake) at any level on or before May 15, 2024.

Eligible public water systems include Community Water Systems of any size and Non-Transient Non-Community Water Systems that serve more than 3,300 people.  A person that is responsible for paying to install or operate a filtration system for a public water system may also be eligible to receive funds from Tyco.

The Court overseeing the litigation held the Final Fairness Hearing on November 1, 2024.  On November 22, 2024, the Court approved the settlement. Once the appellate timetable runs, and that judgment becomes final, the claims period will begin. Qualifying Class Members must submit a Claims Form through the Claim Portal available at www.pfaswatersettlement.com.  Systems that did not detect PFAS in a water source but later detect PFAS in that water source may seek compensation through a Supplemental Claims Form by December 31, 2030.

Additional settlement information is available at www.pfaswatersettlement.com.

BASF Settlement

BASF Corporation has agreed to pay $312.5 million to resolve PFAS-related drinking water contamination claims in the nationwide Aqueous Film-Forming Foam (AFFF) Products Liability Litigation (MDL 2873). The settlement will provide funds to public water systems in the U.S. that tested and found PFAS in a water source (i.e., a groundwater well or a surface water intake) at any level on or before May 15, 2024.

Eligible public water systems include Community Water Systems of any size and Non-Transient Non-Community Water Systems that serve more than 3,300 people.  A person that is responsible for paying to install or operate a filtration system for a public water system may also be eligible to receive funds from Tyco.

The Court overseeing the litigation held the Final Fairness Hearing on November 1, 2024.  On November 22, 2024, the Court approved the settlement. Once the appellate timetable runs, and that judgment becomes final, the claims period will begin. Qualifying Class Members must submit a Claims Form through the Claim Portal available at www.pfaswatersettlement.com.  Systems that did not detect PFAS in a water source but later detect PFAS in that water source may seek compensation through a Supplemental Claims Form by December 31, 2030.

Additional settlement information is available at www.pfaswatersettlement.com.